<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Skatterbrainz World &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skatterbrainz.com/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skatterbrainz.com</link>
	<description>God almighty. If you’re reading this, you might as well jump off a bridge. I typically discuss software technology and business and legal implications of technology and marketing (or the failures thereof). Sound interesting? You need help. Seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Android on AT&amp;T, not soon&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/06/android-on-att-not-soon/</link>
		<comments>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/06/android-on-att-not-soon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff on CrAck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ballmer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skatterbrainz.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors were runing rampant this afternoon about Android coming to AT&#38;T, but in all actuallaty is they are looking at it&#8230; Meanwhile one of those scary things happened  today, I actually have the somewhat same opinion about Android and the G1 as Steve Ballmer, and considering that I may have to reconsider my opinion towards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rumors were runing rampant this afternoon about Android coming to AT&amp;T, but in all actuallaty is they are looking at it&#8230;</p>
<p>Meanwhile one of those scary things happened  today, I actually have the somewhat same opinion about Android and the G1 as Steve Ballmer, and considering that I may have to reconsider my opinion towards the whole Android. Well even a broken clock is right twice a day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/06/android-on-att-not-soon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open my Ass&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/04/open-my-ass/</link>
		<comments>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/04/open-my-ass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff on CrAck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apPle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skatterbrainz.com/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is real interesting to see all the anger directed at apple and att over whet they &#8220;wont&#8221; let you do with an iPhone, but where is the outrage over the inability to use POP IMAP or MAPI on the allegedly &#8220;Open&#8221; android G1. You are stuck with GMail/Google Apps, until someone decides to write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>It is real interesting to see all the anger directed at apple and att over whet they &#8220;wont&#8221; let you do with an iPhone, but where is the outrage over the inability to use POP IMAP or MAPI on the allegedly &#8220;Open&#8221; android G1. You are stuck with GMail/Google Apps, until someone decides to write an app the will handle the &#8220;Standard&#8221; email protocols. </div>
<div>Open as far as carriers go, nope not there either, pretty much gotta go through the same gyrations to jail brake your G1 from tMobile. Then there was the ire over the lack of 3G coverage, I live in Southeast Virginia, and do you know where the closest tMobile 3G coverage is&#8230; Freaking Baltimore, but with at&amp;t I have 3G coverage or real good EDGE pretty much everywhere I go, Hampton Roads, DC and Eastern Shore to Philadelphia, and the only place I have coverage problems is the same places I experienced Verizon holes.</div>
<div>I have had my hands on a G1 and it is a POS, and I am not impressed.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The there is the whole tethering thing, and needing to jump through <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5076233/how-to-tether-the-g1-for-3g-laptop-browsing" target="_blank">hoops</a> to accomplish, as well as violating tMobile&#8217;s TOS..</div>
<div></div>
<div>Its also just funny how every tool out there is jumping up and down about apple not letting Opera on the iPhone. So freaking what, Opera the least used browser next to lynx, Google&#8217;s Chrome passed it by in a month. And as I understand it, opera hasn&#8217;t submitted it yet.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skatterbrainz.com/2008/11/04/open-my-ass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open Orifice or MS Orifice?</title>
		<link>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/07/30/open-orifice-or-ms-orifice/</link>
		<comments>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/07/30/open-orifice-or-ms-orifice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sKatterBrainz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eduKation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socially dysfunctional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techy-geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windowz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/07/30/open-orifice-or-ms-orifice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About twice a year I take a poke at both of the office product suites to see how they&#8217;re progressing. This past month I installed the latest OpenOffice 2.x flavor on both Ubuntu 7.04 and on Windows Vista, as well as Microsoft Office 2007 (on Vista only of course). The shake-down result? Well, it depends. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About twice a year I take a poke at both of the office product suites to see how they&#8217;re progressing.  This past month I installed the latest OpenOffice 2.x flavor on both Ubuntu 7.04 and on Windows Vista, as well as Microsoft Office 2007 (on Vista only of course).</p>
<p>The shake-down result?</p>
<p>Well, it depends.  If you have basic needs, OO will suffice.  If you have specific needs, you will need to take a careful look to know if OO will suffice.  I have to say however, that while I applaud OO&#8217;s efforts, they have been left in the dust by Microsoft.  Office 2007 is simply amazing.  I don&#8217;t like the price tag at all, but the features are simply better.  The products, each of them, are all much improved and amazingly stable.  Not that OO isn&#8217;t stable, but MS-Office has a reputation for being anything but.  Aside from the arguable &#8220;ribbon bar&#8221; change in MSO, the individual features, options and tools are what make it shine overall.  They are most noticable in PowerPoint and Visio, but even Word, Excel and Access have some nice goodies to discover.  I have to say that discovering them has been *almost* fun.  Software?  Fun?  Again?!!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t found software fun to learn since the 1990&#8242;s.  I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s happened, but innovation has turned into refinement. Boring.  BO-RING.  Even Google has become another corporate sloth.  Yeah, sure, they&#8217;re still more &#8220;hip&#8221; than Microsoft, but so is my dog.  So is my neighbor.  Well, maybe not him.  Ok, but my kids are surely more hip than MS.  So where does that leave RedHat, Novell, Yahoo!, etc.?  In the snoozer bed with a blanket.  Nothing new to write home about.  I think all the development teams are busy playing on their Xbox 360&#8242;s or Wii&#8217;s or PS3&#8242;s.  The &#8220;vision&#8221; they once had, has been replaced by MBA visionaries with fancy checkbooks.  Repeat the last success because it&#8217;s less risky (even though it always turns out to be the most risky). WTF?  What happened to us?</p>
<p>So, putting all this into larger context, the stuff that amazes me about MSO 2007 isn&#8217;t that it&#8217;s intrinsicly &#8220;amazing&#8221;, it&#8217;s that they actually made the effort.  OO on the other hand seems to be playing catch-up.  Let&#8217;s face, THERE IS NOTHING INNOVATIVELY &#8220;NEW&#8221; in OpenOffice.  There&#8217;s nothing it has or does that wasn&#8217;t already done in WordPerfect/PerfectOffice or MSO.  Don&#8217;t get me started on little, mamby-pamby buried features.  I&#8217;m talking about the big ticket features, like syntax/grammar checking, auto-completion, auto formatting, mail merging (that over-stated feature), and the retreaded tires of import/export lists.  It&#8217;s all been done.  T-shirts sold out long ago.  The same appears to be true for Linux.  Yes it&#8217;s cool.  Yes, it rocks.  Yes, it does the job.  But what does it &#8220;do&#8221; that CANNOT be done on Windows or OSX or whatever?  Not much.  It&#8217;s free, so that means it rocks.  I&#8217;m not bashing it, but I would really like to see it taken to the next step BEFORE the competition goes there first.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not impressed.  I&#8217;m waiting to be impressed by software again.  Maybe this should be a challenge to the new crop of techie kids?  Take the challenge.  Do something amazing and make it fun to use a computer or mobile device for a change.  The iPhone, like it or not, is proof that there&#8217;s still room for innovation and taking risks to do something different&#8230; and better.  Then again, until the techies toss the MBA&#8217;s out of the meeting rooms and get back to driving the business, it might not ever happen.</p>
<p>So, again, ultimately, MSO 2007 isn&#8217;t really that &#8220;amazing&#8221; but it&#8217;s amazing in the current limited context.  Sort of like how Superman doesn&#8217;t impress anyone on Krypton, but drops jaws on Earth.  Same basic principle.  Maybe that&#8217;s it?  The new generation isn&#8217;t aware of what happened 10-20 years ago.  It&#8217;s all lip-service, reminiscing by balding techies.  They don&#8217;t care.  A remake of a remake is still new to them.  Uh oh, that means DOS might make a comeback?<br />
 <img src='http://skatterbrainz.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/07/30/open-orifice-or-ms-orifice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dubious Stuff here</title>
		<link>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/06/10/dubious-stuff-here/</link>
		<comments>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/06/10/dubious-stuff-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 00:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sKatterBrainz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yeah I Said it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsworthy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/06/10/dubious-stuff-here/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, this article on MSNBC purports to say the DOJ sided with Microsoft by rejecting a complaint filed by Google against Windows Vista.  The article follows the same rhetorical shlock I&#8217;ve heard so often that I&#8217;m ready to puke when I heard it again: which says that Vista is built from the ground up to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19156142/" target="_blank">this article on MSNBC</a> purports to say the DOJ sided with Microsoft by rejecting a complaint filed by Google against Windows Vista.  The article follows the same rhetorical shlock I&#8217;ve heard so often that I&#8217;m ready to puke when I heard it again: which says that Vista is built from the ground up to make it difficult to use Google apps.  Bullshit!  Complete, 100%, total, absolute, male cow manure.</p>
<p>Not only does IE7 work just fine with Google plug-ins, it even upgrades from XP with Google search defaults in tact.  It does.  It has every time I&#8217;ve done that.  I&#8217;ve yet to find one single product or service of Google that works on XP but not on Vista.  Not one.  In fact, the only web-based app I&#8217;ve had a bad time with is posting to my blog (WordPress) from Vista/IE7.  I have to use Firefox (on Vista), to post.  I&#8217;m glad the DOJ could see through their own misgivings about Microsoft to make a logical decision.  There&#8217;s hope for continued &#8220;justice&#8221; and &#8220;fairness&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s already here.  Just that it&#8217;s still possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/06/10/dubious-stuff-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web Apps Suck</title>
		<link>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/04/16/web-apps-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/04/16/web-apps-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techy-geeky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/04/16/web-apps-suck/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m so sick of all the ill-informed opinions about Google Apps being the savior of the modern world.  As if it has 1/8th of the features and functionality of OpenOffice, let alone MS Office.  Not even close.  Not at all.  Some of the most basic features Lotus 123 had YEARS ago are missing.  If you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sick of all the ill-informed opinions about Google Apps being the savior of the modern world.  As if it has 1/8th of the features and functionality of OpenOffice, let alone MS Office.  Not even close.  Not at all.  Some of the most basic features Lotus 123 had YEARS ago are missing.  If you&#8217;re going to enter a market and compete, you should at least match the competition on either price or capability (or both!).  Ok, so FREE is not bad, but it&#8217;s not enough to make up for the lack on capabilities.  Then, add to that the problem of (dramatic theme music&#8230;) &#8220;availability&#8221;.  If you run a business and you give 10 seconds of thought to the idea of replacing desktop apps with Google Apps, you&#8217;re an idiot.  A complete, certifiable f-ing idiot.  The only loophole here would be if your business didn&#8217;t depend on those particular apps.  (which, if that&#8217;s the case, you don&#8217;t count in this discussion anyway).</p>
<p>Until (A) the new Web 2.0 apps actually match or beat current capabilities, and (B) are as rock-solid in terms of availability and reliability, they may hold on, but they&#8217;ll never succeed.  I put them in the same category as tablet PC&#8217;s.  Great idea, bad fit.  Why would I say this?  Because I&#8217;ve been trying to make Google Apps work for almost a year now.  I&#8217;ve given up.  I will try again when they improve the features.  The availability has been pretty good (for home/casual use, not for business use), so I&#8217;m not TOTALLY giving up.  Just giving up for the short term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://skatterbrainz.com/2007/04/16/web-apps-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
